Primary tabs
The National Urban League Wire
Published: Wed. Dec 31, 1969 at 7:00 pm | Updated: Wed. Jun 26, 2013 at 1:06 pm | Comments: 0
Location
See map: Google Maps
Supreme Court Ruling On Shelby Erases 50 Years of Progress on Voting Rights
What the Supreme Court Decided:
In a 5-to-4 decision announced today, the Supreme Court held that the formula used in Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act to determine which states must receive preclearance for voting law changes was unconstitutional. This With this decision, the Court effectively turns back the clock and erases the voting protections guaranteed in the Constitution. Why this Matters:
What We Can Do:
The last time the Voting Rights Act came before Congress in 2006, it passed with broad bi-partisan support. As the evidence shows, the tide of voter suppress has gotten worse—not better since then. We must demand that Congress move quickly to devise a new formula for Section 4. To do otherwise is a blow to the sacrifice of countless men and women who fought and died for the right to vote and, as we prepare to commemorate the 50th anniversary of the Great March on Washington just weeks away, we can best honor those early freedom fighters including Whitney M. Young, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Rep. John Lewis by demanding no less.Stay tuned for more details in the coming days as the Urban League Movement mobilizes to protect our right to vote.
Scotusblog.com, an award-winning online publication covering the Supreme Court, posted the following plain English summary:
“Today’s holding in Shelby County v. Holder, in Plain English: Today the Court issued its decision in Shelby County v. Holder, the challenge to the constitutionality of the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act. That portion of the Act was designed to prevent discrimination in voting by requiring all state and local governments with a history of voting discrimination to get approval from the federal government before making any changes to their voting laws or procedures, no matter how small.
In an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts that was joined by Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, the Court did not invalidate the principle that preclearance can be required. But much more importantly, it held that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, which sets out the formula that is used to determine which state and local governments must comply with Section 5’s preapproval requirement, is unconstitutional and can no longer be used. Thus, although Section 5 survives, it will have no actual effect unless and until Congress can enact a new statute to determine who should be covered by it.”
Read more from Scotusblog.com.
Read the Urban League’s statement responding to today’s ruling.