Primary tabs
Location
Chicago Tribune: Misconceptions seen in health care reform arguments
The campaign goal: “Every American has access to quality and affordable health care solutions!” Join a community that is well informed on health issues in the news. See the links below and Get Empowered Now.
A possible misunderstanding about President Barack Obama's health care overhaul could cloud Supreme Court deliberations, leaving the impression that the law's insurance requirement is more onerous than it is.
During the recent oral arguments some of the justices and the lawyers appearing before them seemed to be under the impression that the law does not allow most consumers to buy low-cost, stripped-down insurance to satisfy its controversial coverage requirement.
In fact, the law provides for a cheaper "bronze" plan that is broadly similar to today's so-called catastrophic coverage policies for individuals, several insurance experts said.
"I think there is confusion," said Paul Keckley, health research chief for Deloitte, a major benefits consultant. "I found myself wondering how much they understood the Affordable Care Act. Several times the questions led me to wonder how much (the justices') clerks had gone back into the law in advance of the arguments."
Click Here to read the full story.